Legislature(1999 - 2000)

1999-05-10 House Journal

Full Journal pdf

1999-05-10                     House Journal                      Page 1289
HB 225                                                                       
The following, which had been held to today's calendar (page 1271),            
was read the second time:                                                      
                                                                               
HOUSE BILL NO. 225                                                            
"An Act relating to election campaigns and legislative ethics; and            
providing for an effective date."                                              
                                                                               
with the:                                                 Journal Page         
                                                                               
	JUD RPT  CS(JUD) 2DP 4NR                                         1259         
	ZERO FISCAL NOTE (H.JUD)                                         1260         
                                                                               

1999-05-10                     House Journal                      Page 1290
HB 225                                                                       
Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent that the                
following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill:        
                                                                               
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 225(JUD)                                                
	(same title)                                                                  
                                                                               
There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                   
                                                                               
Amendment No. 1 was offered  by Representative Croft:                           
                                                                               
Page 4, line 25, following "(C)":                                              
	Insert "reasonable"                                                       
                                                                               
Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that                    
Amendment No. 1 be adopted.                                                    
                                                                               
Representative James objected.                                                 
                                                                               
**The presence of Representative Ogan was noted.                               
                                                                               
The question being:  "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?"  The roll             
was taken with the following result:                                           
                                                                               
CSHB 225(JUD)                                                                  
Second Reading                                                                 
Amendment No. 1                                                                
                                                                               
YEAS:  16   NAYS:  23   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  1                             
                                                                               
                                                                               
Yeas:  Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Grussendorf,            
Hudson, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Moses,                     
Murkowski, Smalley                                                             
                                                                               
Nays:  Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Foster,              
Green, Halcro, Harris, James, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder,            
Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams            
                                                                               
Absent:  Ogan                                                                  
                                                                               
And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted.                                       
                                                                               

1999-05-10                     House Journal                      Page 1291
HB 225                                                                       
Amendment No. 2 (title amendment) was offered by Representative                
Berkowitz:                                                                     
                                                                               
Page 1, line 1:                                                                
	Delete "election campaigns and legislative ethics"                          
	Insert "the date after which a person or group may not make                  
a contribution to a candidate; relating to permitted and prohibited            
uses of public assets and resources under the campaign finance law             
and the legislative ethics code"                                              
                                                                               
Representative Berkowitz moved and asked unanimous consent that                
Amendment No. 2 be adopted.                                                    
                                                                               
Representative Cowdery objected.                                               
                                                                               
The question being:  "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?"  The roll             
was taken with the following result:                                           
                                                                               
CSHB 225(JUD)                                                                  
Second Reading                                                                 
Amendment No. 2                                                                
                                                                               
YEAS:  16   NAYS:  19   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  5                             
                                                                               
Yeas:  Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Grussendorf,            
Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Moses, Murkowski, Phillips,                 
Smalley, Williams                                                              
                                                                               
Nays:  Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris,           
Hudson, James, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Porter, Rokeberg,                  
Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker                                                  
                                                                               
Absent:  Austerman, Coghill, Kohring, Kookesh, Ogan                            
                                                                               
And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted.                                       
                                                                               
Amendment No. 3 was offered  by Representative Berkowitz:                       
                                                                               
Page 3, line 24, following "unlimited":                                    
	Delete "use"                                                              
	Insert "direction"                                                        
                                                                               

1999-05-10                     House Journal                      Page 1292
HB 225                                                                       
Representative Berkowitz moved and asked unanimous consent that                
Amendment No. 3 be adopted.                                                    
                                                                               
Representative Cowdery objected.                                               
                                                                               
The question being:  "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?"  The roll             
was taken with the following result:                                           
                                                                               
CSHB 225(JUD)                                                                  
Second Reading                                                                 
Amendment No. 3                                                                
                                                                               
YEAS:  16   NAYS:  20   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  4                             
                                                                               
                                                                               
Yeas:  Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Grussendorf,            
Hudson, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Moses, Porter, Smalley,             
Williams                                                                       
                                                                               
Nays:  Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris,           
James, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Phillips,              
Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker                                        
                                                                               
Absent:  Austerman, Coghill, Kookesh, Ogan                                     
                                                                               
And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted.                                       
                                                                               
                                                                               
Amendment No. 4 was offered  by Representative Berkowitz:                       
                                                                               
Page 3, line 25, following "cards":                                        
	Insert ", except that seasonal greeting cards may not be mailed             
for sixty days preceding a state primary or general election"                
                                                                               
Representative Berkowitz moved and asked unanimous consent that                
Amendment No. 4 be adopted.                                                    
                                                                               
Representative Kott objected.                                                  
                                                                               
The question being:  "Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted?"  The roll             
was taken with the following result:                                           
                                                                               

1999-05-10                     House Journal                      Page 1293
HB 225                                                                       
                                                                               
CSHB 225(JUD)                                                                  
Second Reading                                                                 
Amendment No. 4                                                                
                                                                               
YEAS:  18   NAYS:  22   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                             
                                                                               
Yeas:  Berkowitz, Brice, Bunde, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf,            
Halcro, Hudson, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Moses,             
Murkowski, Smalley, Therriault                                                 
                                                                               
Nays:  Austerman, Barnes, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster,              
Green, Harris, James, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Ogan,              
Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Whitaker, Williams                        
                                                                               
And so, Amendment No. 4 was not adopted.                                       
                                                                               
                                                                               
Amendment No. 5 was offered  by Representative Croft:                           
                                                                               
Page 2, line 28, following "activity,":                                        
	Insert "or for preparation or mailing of seasonal greeting cards,"            
                                                                               
Page 3, lines 24 - 25:                                                         
	Delete all material.                                                          
                                                                               
Reletter the following subparagraphs accordingly.                              
                                                                               
Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that                    
Amendment No. 5 be adopted.                                                    
                                                                               
Representative Barnes objected.                                                
                                                                               
The question being:  "Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted?"  The roll             
was taken with the following result:                                           
                                                                               
CSHB 225(JUD)                                                                  
Second Reading                                                                 
Amendment No. 5                                                                
                                                                               
YEAS:  17   NAYS:  21   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  2                             
                                                                               
                                                                               

1999-05-10                     House Journal                      Page 1294
HB 225                                                                       
Yeas:  Berkowitz, Brice, Bunde, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf,            
Halcro, Hudson, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Moses,                      
Murkowski, Smalley, Whitaker                                                   
                                                                               
Nays:  Austerman, Barnes, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster,              
Green, Harris, James, Kohring, Kott, Morgan, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips,           
Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Williams                                
                                                                               
Absent:  Kookesh, Masek                                                        
                                                                               
And so, Amendment No. 5 was not adopted.                                       
                                                                               
Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB               
225(JUD) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and                
placed on final passage.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.         
                                                                               
CSHB 225(JUD) was read the third time.                                         
                                                                               
The question being:  "Shall CSHB 225(JUD) pass the House?"  The                
roll was taken with the following result:                                      
                                                                               
CSHB 225(JUD)                                                                  
Third Reading                                                                  
Final Passage                                                                  
                                                                               
YEAS:  27   NAYS:  12   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  1                             
                                                                               
Yeas:  Austerman, Barnes, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster,              
Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Joule, Kapsner, Kohring, Kott,           
Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders,              
Therriault, Whitaker, Williams                                                 
                                                                               
Nays:  Berkowitz, Brice, Bunde, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf,            
Kemplen, Kerttula, Moses, Murkowski, Smalley                                   
                                                                               
Absent:  Kookesh                                                               
                                                                               
And so, CSHB 225(JUD) passed the House.                                        
                                                                               
Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll           
call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the             
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.           

1999-05-10                     House Journal                      Page 1295
HB 225                                                                       
Representative Kerttula gave notice of reconsideration of her vote on          
CSHB 225(JUD).