Legislature(2003 - 2004)
2004-05-03 House JournalFull Journal pdf
2004-05-03 House Journal Page 3763 SB 300 The following was read the second time: CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 300(FIN) "An Act relating to an attorney's lien, to court actions, and to other proceedings where attorneys are employed; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page JUD RPT HCS(JUD) 5DP 1AM 3401 FN1: ZERO(DNR) 3402 FN2: ZERO(CRT) 3402 FN3: ZERO(LAW) 3402 FIN RPT HCS(JUD) 7DP 1NR 3581 FN1: ZERO(DNR) 3581 FN2: ZERO(CRT) 3581 FN3: ZERO(LAW) 3581 2004-05-03 House Journal Page 3764 Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 300(JUD) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that HCS CSSB 300(JUD) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HCS CSSB 300(JUD) was read the third time. **The presence of Representative Weyhrauch was noted. The question being: "Shall HCS CSSB 300(JUD) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 300(JUD) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 39 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gara, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Kott, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stepovich, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Williams, Wilson, Wolf Absent: Anderson And so, HCS CSSB 300(JUD) passed the House. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. 2004-05-03 House Journal Page 3765 HCS CSSB 300(JUD) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.