Legislature(2009 - 2010)

2010-04-13 House Journal

Full Journal pdf

2010-04-13                     House Journal                      Page 2245
HB 294                                                                                                                        
Representative T. Wilson gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on                                                          
CSHB 294(FIN) (page 2243).                                                                                                      
Representative T. Wilson moved and asked unanimous consent that                                                                 
reconsideration of CSHB 294(FIN) be taken up on the same day.                                                                   
There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                                                    
The following was again before the House in third reading:                                                                      
    CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 294(FIN)                                                                                              
    "An Act amending the termination date of certain statutes relating                                                          
    to the use, operation, and regulation of boats, a uniform state                                                             
    waterway marking system, and civil liability for boat owners by                                                             
    extending the termination date by two years; providing for an                                                               
    effective date by amending the effective date of secs. 3, 5, 7, 9, 11,                                                      
    14, 16, 18, 20, 23, 26, and 27, ch. 28, SLA 2000, as amended; and                                                           
    providing for an effective date."                                                                                           
The question to be reconsidered:  "Shall CSHB 294(FIN) pass the                                                                 
House?"  The roll was taken with the following result:                                                                          
CSHB 294(FIN)                                                                                                                   
Third Reading                                                                                                                   
Final Passage                                                                                                                   
YEAS:  37   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  3                                                                               
Yeas:  Austerman, Buch, Chenault, Cissna, Crawford, Dahlstrom,                                                                  
Doogan, Fairclough, N.Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg,                                                                  
Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Herron, Holmes, Johansen, Kawasaki,                                                                 
Keller, Kelly, Kerttula, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson,                                                                   
Petersen, Ramras, Salmon, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Tuck, P.Wilson,                                                              
Absent:  Edgmon, Johnson, Joule                                                                                                 
And so, CSHB 294(FIN) passed the House on reconsideration.                                                                      

2010-04-13                     House Journal                      Page 2246
Representative Johansen moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                                              
roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                                                         
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                            
CSHB 294(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.