Legislature(2009 - 2010)
2009-04-08 House JournalFull Journal pdf
2009-04-08 House Journal Page 0821 HR 10 Representative Foster moved and asked unanimous consent that the following be taken up as a Special Order of Business: HOUSE RESOLUTION NO. 10 Expressing support for Senator Ted Stevens and severe displeasure and indignation with the federal government's deplorable investigation and prosecution of the Senator. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representatives Foster and Gara: Page 2, lines 3 - 4: Delete all material. Page 2, lines 8 - 10: Delete all material and insert: "WHEREAS questions have arisen as to whether provisions of the Hatch Act have been violated; and" Representative Gara moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Thomas: Page 1, line 9: Delete "is" Insert "was" Representative Thomas moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The question being: "Shall HR 10 am pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2009-04-08 House Journal Page 0822 HR 10 am Special Order of Business YEAS: 34 NAYS: 1 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 4 Yeas: Austerman, Buch, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Edgmon, Fairclough, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Hawker, Herron, Holmes, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Keller, Kelly, Kerttula, Lynn, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Petersen, Salmon, Seaton, Thomas, Tuck, Wilson Nays: Doogan Excused: Millett Absent: Harris, Kawasaki, Ramras, Stoltze And so, HR 10 am passed the House and was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment and enrollment.