Legislature(2015 - 2016)
2016-04-09 House JournalFull Journal pdf
2016-04-09 House Journal Page 2159 HB 274 The following, which was advanced to third reading from the April 8, 2016, calendar (page 2133), was read the third time: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 274(RES) "An Act relating to extensions of certain state land leases; relating to the exchange of state land; and relating to the definition of 'state land.'" Representative Kito moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 274(RES) be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 1. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Kito: Page 3, lines 8 - 9: Delete ", including the land estate, the mineral estate, or both," Page 3, lines 10 - 14: Delete "[EXCHANGES SHALL BE FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSOLIDATING STATE LAND HOLDINGS, CREATING LAND OWNERSHIP AND USE PATTERNS WHICH WILL PERMIT MORE EFFECTIVE ADMINISTRATION OF THE STATE PUBLIC DOMAIN, FACILITATING THE OBJECTIVES OF STATE PROGRAMS, OR OTHER PUBLIC PURPOSES.]" Insert "Exchanges shall be for the purpose of consolidating state land holdings, creating land ownership and use patterns that [WHICH] will permit more effective administration of the state public domain, facilitating the objectives of state programs, or other public purposes." Page 4, lines 8 - 19: Delete all material. Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. 2016-04-09 House Journal Page 2160 Representative Kito moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Munoz objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 274(RES) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 4 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, Ortiz, Tarr, Tuck, Vazquez Nays: Chenault, Colver, Edgmon, Foster, Gara, Gattis, Herron, Johnson, Keller, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Nageak, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stutes, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson Excused: Hawker, Hughes, Spohnholz, Wool And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. The question being: "Shall CSHB 274(RES) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 274(RES) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 33 NAYS: 3 EXCUSED: 4 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Chenault, Claman, Colver, Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Gara, Gattis, Guttenberg, Herron, Johnson, Keller, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Nageak, Neuman, Olson, Ortiz, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stutes, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vazquez, Wilson Nays: Josephson, Kawasaki, Tarr 2016-04-09 House Journal Page 2161 Excused: Hawker, Hughes, Spohnholz, Wool And so, CSHB 274(RES) passed the House and was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.