Legislature(2017 - 2018)
2018-03-05 House JournalFull Journal pdf
2018-03-05 House Journal Page 2606 HB 96 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 96 "An Act amending the calculation of adjusted gross income for purposes of the tax on gambling activities aboard large passenger vessels; repealing a provision allowing an investigation expense under the Alaska Small Loans Act to be in place of a fee required under the Alaska Business License Act; repealing the amount that may be deducted from the tobacco excise tax to cover the expense of accounting and filing for the monthly tax return; repealing the discount on cigarette tax stamps provided as compensation for affixing the stamps to packages; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page FIN RPT CS(FIN) 11DP 2566 FN1: ZERO(CED) 2567 FN2: ZERO(CED) 2567 FN3: INDETERMINATE(REV) 2567 Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 96(FIN) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 96(FIN) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 96(FIN) was read the third time. 2018-03-05 House Journal Page 2607 The question being: "Shall CSHB 96(FIN) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 96(FIN) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 35 NAYS: 1 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 VACANT: 1 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Millett, Neuman, Parish, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Wilson, Wool Nays: Eastman Excused: Lincoln, Ortiz, Spohnholz And so, CSHB 96(FIN) passed the House. Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 96(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.