Legislature(2017 - 2018)BARNES 124

04/17/2017 01:00 PM RESOURCES

Note: the audio and video recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.

Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as

* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled TELECONFERENCED
+= HB 201 MUNICIPAL REGULATION OF TRAPPING TELECONFERENCED
Moved CSHB 201(CRA) Out of Committee
-- Public Testimony --
*+ HB 197 COMMUNITY SEED LIBRARIES TELECONFERENCED
Scheduled but Not Heard
-- Testimony <Invitation Only> --
*+ HB 217 RAW MILK SALES; FOOD EXEMPT FROM REGS TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
-- Testimony <Invitation Only> --
*+ HB 218 STATE VETERINARIAN;ANIMALS;PRODUCTS TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
-- Testimony <Invitation Only> --
**Streamed live on AKL.tv**
            HB 201-MUNICIPAL REGULATION OF TRAPPING                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
1:04:24 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR  JOSEPHSON announced  that  the first  order of  business                                                              
would  be  HOUSE BILL  NO.  201,  "An Act  relating  to  municipal                                                              
regulation  of trapping;  and  providing  for an  effective  date.                                                              
[Before the committee was CSHB 201(CRA).]                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
1:04:35 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON opened public testimony.                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
1:04:58 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
NICK STEEN  testified in opposition to  HB 201.  He said  the bill                                                              
would  give  the  borough control  over  trapping  regulations  on                                                              
state  and/or federal  lands.   He stated  that this  would add  a                                                              
third  level of  potential law  or  regulations on  trapping in  a                                                              
given area    state, federal, and  borough   and would  do nothing                                                              
to  correct a  perceived problem.   Mr.  Steen further  maintained                                                              
that  trap  identification  is  a  worthless  bit  of  information                                                              
because all  a trapper  has to do  is claim that  a trap  has been                                                              
stolen at  the beginning of the  season, and the trapper  is "home                                                              
free" for the  rest of the season.   He clarified he  isn't saying                                                              
trappers  are   illegal,  but  rather   it  is  an   unenforceable                                                              
regulation.   All the bill would  do is add more paperwork  to the                                                              
already existing  problem of too  many regulations on  hunting and                                                              
fishing in  the state.  For example,  when he came to  Alaska over                                                              
50 years  ago the regulations were  pocketbook sized, but  not any                                                              
longer.   He recognized  that things  are becoming  more and  more                                                              
involved because there  are more people, but said  more laws don't                                                              
make it better.                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
1:06:22 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
KNEELAND TAYLOR  testified in  strong support  of CSHB  201 (CRA).                                                              
He   said  it   is   an  excellent   bill   because  it   provides                                                              
clarification on  what a municipal  government can and  cannot do.                                                              
He  offered  his  belief that  municipalities  should  have  their                                                              
authority  clearly outlined  on  regulating the  placing of  traps                                                              
that can  cause injury and,  in particular,  injury to dogs.   The                                                              
idea that  the Board  of Game  and the  Alaska Department  of Fish                                                              
and  Game (ADF&G)  can  handle this  is  somewhat far-fetched,  he                                                              
continued.   It is a  mind-boggling task  on a statewide  basis to                                                              
identify literally  hundreds of  trails, hundreds of  small public                                                              
parks, and  densely populated  subdivisions where everyone  agrees                                                              
that  traps shouldn't  be placed.    It is  the local  governments                                                              
that have the  expertise and knowledge as to  whether traps should                                                              
be  placed at  the end  of a  particular street,  in a  particular                                                              
subdivision  inside that  municipality.   In the  case of  federal                                                              
lands, he  said, a  clear delineation of  what a local  government                                                              
can do  in terms  of setbacks  or placing  of traps  on trails  on                                                              
federal  lands  gives  those municipal  governments  a  chance  to                                                              
fight back  if the  federal government tries  to impose  its view.                                                              
It  is  an excellent  bill  because  it  would provide  for  local                                                              
control.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR  JOSEPHSON, sponsor  of HB  201, referenced  a letter  of                                                              
opposition that the  committee received from Al  Barrette in which                                                              
Mr. Barrette  states that the Board  of Game can handle  this.  He                                                              
asked whether Mr.  Taylor is personally aware of  residents of the                                                              
Matanuska-Susitna  Borough  who  have drafted  proposals  to  deal                                                              
with the problem of dogs getting caught in traps.                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
MR. TAYLOR  replied  he is not  personally aware  of whether  they                                                              
have or  have not.  However,  he continued,  he was on a  Board of                                                              
Game subcommittee  that addressed  this issue  in 2002  and, after                                                              
many meetings with  trappers, board chairman Ted  Spraker said the                                                              
board did  not think this  issue was a  problem.  Four  years ago,                                                              
local  residents of  Cooper Landing  submitted a  proposal to  the                                                              
Board  of  Game   that  would  have  designated   several  trails,                                                              
trailheads,  and beach  along  Kenai Lake  as  places where  traps                                                              
could not be placed,  but that proposal was rejected.   In talking                                                              
with  board  members about  the  rejection  of that  proposal,  he                                                              
related,  it really  boiled down  to a people  issue.   Basically,                                                              
one  member of  the board,  Ted Spraker,  viewed it  as the  local                                                              
residents  asking for  too much  and therefore  they got  nothing.                                                              
It is a  far-fetched idea, he  reiterated, that the Board  of Game                                                              
will  be able to  do this  or would  be inclined  to assist  local                                                              
communities in handling this problem.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
1:11:07 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
AL BARRETTE  testified in opposition  to HB  201.  If  enacted, he                                                              
said, it  would be  a competing statute  with Alaska  Statute (AS)                                                              
16.05.255,  Regulations of  the  Board of  Game,  under which  the                                                              
Board  of Game is  granted the  regulation of  wildlife, even  for                                                              
public safety.   Further, he continued, he has a  problem with two                                                              
competing authorities  creating regulations or  ordinances because                                                              
this  would hinder  trappers in  finding restriction  information.                                                              
The  current  trapping  regulation   handbook  distinguishes  what                                                              
trapping  restrictions  exist.   He  said municipalities  such  as                                                              
Fairbanks, Anchorage,  Valdez, Skagway,  and Prince of  Wales have                                                              
come  before the  Board  of Game  concerning  trapping issues  and                                                              
have received favorable  action by the board.   Not every proposal                                                              
before the  Board of Game gets  passed.  Proposals must  meet some                                                              
merits and input  is taken from regulation specialists  within the                                                              
Department of Law and other state agencies.                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
MR. BARRETTE stated  he specifically has an issue on  page 1, line                                                              
13, which  states, "trap  identification  requirements".   He said                                                              
this  provision  is unclear  and  it  could  be argued  what  that                                                              
actually means.   Terminology is everything  in a court  of law or                                                              
in regulations  or statute.   He then drew  attention to  the bill                                                              
on  page 2,  line 1,  which states,  "restrictions on  the use  of                                                              
types of  traps likely  to cause  injury or  damage to  persons or                                                              
property."    He said  he  doesn't  know  of  any trap  made  that                                                              
doesn't cause  injury, so he wonders  what trap is out  there that                                                              
would fit this definition if the bill were enacted.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
MR. BARRETTE  pointed out  that the bill  doesn't mention  the use                                                              
of  snares  and  said  there is  a  difference  in  definition  in                                                              
regulation between  a steel trap and  a snare.  He  suggested this                                                              
be clarified.   He  further pointed  out that  the bill  uses what                                                              
trapping  means by the  statutory definition  and maintained  that                                                              
this definition  only relates  to furbearers.   Other  animals are                                                              
classified as small  game, unclassified game, and  fur animals, he                                                              
continued,  and these  animals are  allowed to  be trapped  with a                                                              
trapping  license  or a  hunting  license.    This bill  has  many                                                              
complications,  he said,  including having  two governing  bodies,                                                              
one which has  been appointed and confirmed based  on knowledge of                                                              
wildlife resources,  and the  other that  is basically  elected by                                                              
their political views.                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
1:14:45 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR  JOSEPHSON surmised  Mr. Barrette  wants the  bill to  be                                                              
more expansive  because one  of Mr.  Barrette's positions  is that                                                              
municipalities should  not have any  authority, but when  it comes                                                              
to what municipalities  have authority over Mr.  Barrette wants to                                                              
expand the definition to even more mammals.                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
MR. BARRETTE  replied that he  is pointing out  he is not  for the                                                              
bill as  written and that  he is further  pointing out  the errors                                                              
and complications in the bill should it be passed as written.                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
1:15:33 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR  JOSEPHSON recalled  Mr.  Barrette's  statement that  the                                                              
Board  of Game  responds to  municipal interests  in this  regard,                                                              
but stated  that he thinks  there is evidence  the board  does not                                                              
respond  to municipal  interests.    He inquired  why  there is  a                                                              
problem  with the  bill  if  the Board  of  Game does  respond  to                                                              
municipalities.  He  posed a scenario in which  a local government                                                              
is  concerned  for  public  safety,  which  is  within  the  local                                                              
purview, and wants  to regulate around a schoolyard.   He said Mr.                                                              
Barrette's position  is that the  board will accommodate  that and                                                              
therefore he doesn't understand the concern.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR. BARRETTE  responded that his  main issue is with  state lands.                                                              
He  offered his  belief that  Co-Chair Josephson  is correct  that                                                              
boroughs  and  municipalities  have   ownership  of  their  lands;                                                              
however, there have  been times when state land was  an issue.  He                                                              
recalled that  Juneau brought  a [proposal] to  the Board  of Game                                                              
that was  passed.  Municipalities  can write a proposal  and bring                                                              
it to  the board,  he continued.   It will  be vetted  through the                                                              
deliberation and  public comment processes  but there is  a chance                                                              
it  might not  pass,  which  happened  in Cooper  Landing's  case.                                                              
Justification was  put on record as  to why the board  didn't pass                                                              
it, he said, not all proposals get passed.                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
1:17:06 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE WESTLAKE  noted the  committee has been  working on                                                              
making this  back into  a local  control issue.   He said  he sees                                                              
where  Mr.  Barrette is  coming  from  and  that Mr.  Barrette  is                                                              
talking  about  state regulations  versus  municipal  regulations.                                                              
Representative  Westlake offered  his understanding  that if,  for                                                              
example,  his village wanted  to opt  in and  create its  own laws                                                              
and ordinances  for trapping within  the city limits, it  could do                                                              
that, and the  state would have  no real say, but beyond  the city                                                              
or borough limits  it would go back  over to the state.   He asked                                                              
Mr. Barrette whether he is misunderstanding something.                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
MR. BARRETTE answered  that he thinks Representative  Westlake has                                                              
it perfectly.  The  Board of Game controls state  land and private                                                              
property and the boroughs control their property.                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
1:18:15 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH  said he shares  Mr. Barrett's concerns.   He                                                              
related that  the Matanuska-Susitna  Borough has implemented  some                                                              
sort of local control  on trapping, as has Anchorage.   He offered                                                              
his  appreciation  for  Mr. Barrette's  concerns  and  said  local                                                              
control works well from his experience.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR  JOSEPHSON asked  legal counsel  Alpheus Bullard  whether                                                              
snares  would  be  something a  local  government  could  regulate                                                              
under HB 201.                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
1:19:36 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
ALPHEUS    BULLARD,   Attorney,    Legislative   Legal    Counsel,                                                              
Legislative   Legal   Services,    Legislative   Affairs   Agency,                                                              
acknowledged it's  possible that the [regulation of  snares] is an                                                              
inadequacy  in this  legislation.   But  if it  is, he  continued,                                                              
it's  also  a  problem  in the  state's  fish  and  game  statutes                                                              
because  the definition  of trapping  that's provided  for all  of                                                              
Title 16  is referenced  in this  legislation and that  definition                                                              
of trapping  is what controls  what can  be taken with  a trapping                                                              
license.   So, he  added, if  snares are  allowed under  Title 16,                                                              
then  a  local   municipality  could  regulate  them   under  this                                                              
legislation.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON  noted the  committee has  an opinion  from the                                                              
Matanuska-Susitna  Borough attorney.   He requested  Mr. Bullard's                                                              
opinion  on whether  municipalities  have the  power within  their                                                              
purview to regulate trapping within their borders.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
MR.  BULLARD responded  that  to  the extent  it  is a  legitimate                                                              
ordinance  and it  protects  human life  and  property within  the                                                              
municipality's boundaries,  it is  a legitimate local  concern and                                                              
well within the municipality's purview.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
1:21:11 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON  closed public testimony after  ascertaining no                                                              
one else wished to testify.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER  inquired whether  he is correct  that the                                                              
bill does not reference private lands.                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR  JOSEPHSON  answered  that  the  bill  doesn't  speak  to                                                              
private lands  except by implication.   It would be a  heavy lift,                                                              
he said, for  a member of a  city council or assembly  to offer an                                                              
ordinance  to regulate  trapping  on someone's  private land;  but                                                              
there would be nothing prohibiting it in this bill.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  RAUSCHER understood  there is nothing  prohibiting                                                              
that and asked whether that means it is inclusive.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON  replied it is  inclusive per page 1,  line 10.                                                              
He said bills that list everything become very long.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH  stated he does not support  the bill because                                                              
it is unnecessary.   As said  by Mr. Bullard, he  continued, local                                                              
communities  can  take  care  of   themselves  and  can  implement                                                              
trapping  regulations   as  was  done  by   the  Matanuska-Susitna                                                              
[Borough].  He  said his preference is  that it be left  up to the                                                              
local communities to manage their own affairs.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
1:24:31 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  TALERICO remarked that  it is  clear as mud  as to                                                              
where this will  fit in the actual charter code  of ordinances for                                                              
particular municipalities  and ordinances that they  have adopted.                                                              
[The  committee] could  probably  get a  legal opinion  to say  it                                                              
will  be land  use regulation  because theoretically  it could  be                                                              
said that an ordinance  has been written that traps  cannot be put                                                              
on the  ground in particular  spots.   However, he continued,  the                                                              
issue is that  most of the codes  for land use regulation  that he                                                              
is  familiar with  deal with  boundaries and  lines and  community                                                              
plans  and  that type  of  structure,  not restrictions  on  these                                                              
other things.   The other avenue,  he said, would probably  be the                                                              
adoption  of  public safety  powers.    However, whether  real  or                                                              
imagined, a fear  in smaller municipalities is that  if they adopt                                                              
public  safety powers  they are  not  far away  from losing  their                                                              
state trooper  when the  state then steps  in saying  that because                                                              
the  municipality  has  public  safety  powers it  must  now  take                                                              
responsibility.                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  TALERICO said  his biggest  issue has  to do  with                                                              
previous experience  in that he is  very defensive of Title  29 in                                                              
its current  form and the way it  is written.  Before  any changes                                                              
are made,  he continued, he  would have  to hear from  an enormous                                                              
number of municipalities  saying they need this  particular change                                                              
in Title  29.  He argued that  a municipality choosing  a trapping                                                              
ordinance  would  not  have enforcement  provided  by  the  Alaska                                                              
Wildlife  Troopers  because  these troopers  do  state  regulatory                                                              
issues.   He said he  opposes the bill,  but appreciates  the idea                                                              
of trying  to figure  out a  way to  resolve this  issue, but  the                                                              
bill does not resolve it for him.                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON  responded he  takes the aforementioned  point,                                                              
but said  that if a municipality  passes an ordinance  and doesn't                                                              
wish to enforce it, it just will not be enforced very well.                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
1:27:55 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  WESTLAKE  inquired whether  HB  201, as  proposed,                                                              
would  grant  more  power  to municipalities  or  boroughs.    For                                                              
example,  he said,  whether it  would move  it over  to the  local                                                              
level  where the  local level  can  use these  powers and  enforce                                                              
these powers on their own.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
MR.  BULLARD  answered  that  if the  legislation  is  passed  and                                                              
enacted, it  would be  in the general  powers in  AS 29.35  and it                                                              
would  provide   that  both   for  general   law  and   home  rule                                                              
municipalities,  this is  the power that  municipalities  have and                                                              
in that  way, it would  clear up  what power these  municipalities                                                              
have to enact an ordinance like this.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
1:29:26 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE WESTLAKE  asked whether it would then  be up to the                                                              
municipality or borough to enforce these powers.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
MR. BULLARD  replied yes,  correct, it would  be completely  up to                                                              
whatever municipality that passed it to enforce it.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON  added that  a local  government would  have to                                                              
make  a legitimate  claim that  the restriction  was necessary  to                                                              
prevent injury  or damage to persons  or property and that  it was                                                              
in an area or location where that injury or damage could occur.                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER  said he  appreciates that "may"  was used                                                              
so many  times in the  bill and appreciates  that the  sponsor was                                                              
working  with municipalities  and  their  abilities  to choose  by                                                              
using  the   word  "may".     However,  he  continued,   what  the                                                              
legislature  does  with  people's  private property  and  how  the                                                              
legislature regulates  it is of worry  to him.  He said  he had an                                                              
amendment that  he didn't offer  because he didn't think  it would                                                              
have passed.  He  stated he is not in favor of  the bill, although                                                              
he appreciates that the sponsor is trying to work on a problem.                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE PARISH  noted that the bill explicitly  expands the                                                              
authority of municipalities/local  governments into  an area where                                                              
it would be thought  that they already have the  authority to say,                                                              
for  example,  no  traps  near  the  local  school  regardless  of                                                              
whether  that  school  is  on  state  or  private  property.    He                                                              
recalled a  tragic story told  by Representative Westlake  about a                                                              
child who  came too close  to a cyanide  trap and the  child's dog                                                              
died but  the child was able  to rinse his  own eyes.  He  said he                                                              
thinks   it  appropriate   to  explicitly   give   the  power   to                                                              
municipalities to be  able to say that there are  some areas where                                                              
they do not  want traps that could  harm people or property.   The                                                              
sort of trap that  doesn't harm persons or property  would be live                                                              
traps, and these  types of traps are used frequently  for nuisance                                                              
animals.  He said it is a useful bill that he supports.                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR  JOSEPHSON noted  that HB  40 [a bill  he sponsored]  was                                                              
clearly a much  more ambitious bill in regard  to 200-foot buffers                                                              
near public  trails.  He  said the feedback  on HB 40 was  that it                                                              
should be  handled by  the local  governments and  so that  is the                                                              
bill now before  the committee.  The criticism of  HB 40 was vast,                                                              
he continued,  while the  criticism of HB  201, to his  knowledge,                                                              
has been restricted to a couple letters.                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
1:34:39 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR  TARR moved  to  report CSHB  201(CRA)  out of  committee                                                              
with  individual  recommendations   and  the  accompanying  fiscal                                                              
notes.                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE TALERICO objected.                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
1:35:44 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
A roll call  vote was taken.  Representatives  Westlake, Drummond,                                                              
Parish,  Tarr, and  Josephson  voted in  favor  of CSHB  201(CRA).                                                              
Representatives  Rauscher, Talerico, and  Birch voted  against it.                                                              
Therefore, CSHB  201 (CRA) was  reported from the  House Resources                                                              
Standing Committee by a vote of 5-3.                                                                                            

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
HB 197 Sponsor Statement.pdf HRES 4/10/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/19/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/28/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 5/1/2017 1:00:00 PM
HB 197
HB197 Version J 4.5.2017.pdf HRES 4/10/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/19/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/28/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 5/1/2017 1:00:00 PM
HB 197
HB197 Sectional Analysis ver J 4.6.2017.pdf HRES 4/10/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/19/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/28/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 5/1/2017 1:00:00 PM
HB 197
HB197 Fiscal Note - DNR-PMC 4.7.17.pdf HRES 4/10/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/19/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/28/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 5/1/2017 1:00:00 PM
HB 197
HB197 Supporting Document - Article. Seed Bill 4.9.17.pdf HRES 4/10/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/19/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/28/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 5/1/2017 1:00:00 PM
HB 197
HB 201 Sponsor Statement.pdf HCRA 4/11/2017 8:00:00 AM
HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM
HB 201
HB 201 vers A 3.30.17.PDF HCRA 4/11/2017 8:00:00 AM
HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM
HB 201
HB 201 1982 AG Opinion.pdf HCRA 4/11/2017 8:00:00 AM
HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM
HB 201
HB 201 Case law.pdf HCRA 4/11/2017 8:00:00 AM
HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM
HB 201
HB 201 Matsu Ordinance 3.21.2017.pdf HCRA 4/11/2017 8:00:00 AM
HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM
HB 201
HB 201 Muni Trapping Codes.pdf HCRA 4/11/2017 8:00:00 AM
HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM
HB 201
HB 201 News Articles.pdf HCRA 4/11/2017 8:00:00 AM
HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM
HB 201
HB201-DFG-DWC-04-07-17.pdf HCRA 4/11/2017 8:00:00 AM
HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM
HB 201
HB 201 LAA Legal Memos.pdf HCRA 4/11/2017 8:00:00 AM
HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM
HB 201
HB217 Version A 4.16.17.PDF HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 2/7/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 2/14/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 217
HB217 Supporting Document - Wyoming Expands Food Freedom Act 4.16.17.PDF HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM
HB 217
HB217 Supporting Document - USDA Wrongly Targets Wyoming's Food Freedom Act 4.16.17.PDF HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM
HB 217
HB217 Supporting Document - Colorado Cottage Foods Act Fact Sheet 4.16.17.PDF HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM
HB 217
HB217 Supporting Document - Article Natural News 4.16.17.PDF HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM
HB 217
HB217 Supporting Document - Article Mother Earth Jones 4.16.17.PDF HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM
HB 217
HB217 Supporting Document - Colorado Cottage Foods Act.pdf HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM
HB 217
HB217 Fiscal Note - DEC-EHL 04-07-17.pdf HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM
HB 217
HB217 Fiscal Note - DEC-FSS 4.7.17.pdf HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM
HB 217
HB218 Sponsor Statement 4.11.17.pdf HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 5/1/2017 1:00:00 PM
HB 218
HB218 Version A 4.16.17.PDF HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM
HRES 5/1/2017 1:00:00 PM
HB 218
HB217 Sponsor Statement 4.17.17.pdf HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM
HB 217