Legislature(2017 - 2018)GRUENBERG 120

04/03/2018 03:15 PM STATE AFFAIRS

Note: the audio and video recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.

Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as

Audio Topic
03:18:40 PM Start
03:20:07 PM Presentation(s): Overview of Permanent Fund Proposals
04:40:30 PM HB407
04:49:29 PM SCR17
04:52:41 PM SB163
05:22:12 PM Approval of Introduction of Potential Committee Legislation
05:23:07 PM HB83
05:48:53 PM Adjourn
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
*+ HB 407 APOC; CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS/REPORTING TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
+ SCR 17 APRIL 2018:SEXUAL ASSAULT AWARENESS MONTH TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
+ SB 163 DEFINITION OF COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLES TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
+= HB 83 TEACHERS & PUB EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT PLANS TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
-- Public Testimony --
+ Approval of introduction of potential committee TELECONFERENCED
legislation
+ Presentation: Overview of Permanent Fund TELECONFERENCED
Proposals in the Legislature by Reid Magdanz &
Rob Ervine
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled TELECONFERENCED
         HB 83-TEACHERS & PUB EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT PLANS                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
5:23:07 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS  announced that the final  order of business                                                               
would be the  CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 83(L&C),  "An Act relating to                                                               
new  defined benefit  tiers in  the public  employees' retirement                                                               
system  and the  teachers' retirement  system; providing  certain                                                               
employees an  opportunity to choose  between the  defined benefit                                                               
and  defined   contribution  plans   of  the   public  employees'                                                               
retirement  system  and  the  teachers'  retirement  system;  and                                                               
providing for an effective date."                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
5:23:29 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
EDRIC  CARRILLO, Staff,  Representative  Sam  Kito, Alaska  State                                                               
Legislature, read  the changes to  HB 83 from a  document titled,                                                               
"Explanation of  Changes, HB 83,  PERs/TRS, Version N  to Version                                                               
T, which read as follows [original punctuation provided]:                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
     Version  T  includes the  following  changes  to HB  83                                                                    
     version N:                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
     ? Broadened  the title  to refer to  more than  the new                                                                    
     tiers, use  the more  precise title  "Public Employees'                                                                    
     Retirement System of Alaska."                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
     ?  Added a  new  Sec. 1  at  the department's  request,                                                                    
     making it easier  for teachers to return  to work after                                                                    
     recovering from  a disability.  The section  will allow                                                                    
     TRS to  accept a  certification of  rehabilitation from                                                                    
     other states' vocational rehabilitation offices.                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
     ? Changed  Sec. 6 at  the department's request  to ease                                                                    
     potentially  burdensome exams  for  teachers getting  a                                                                    
     disability pension.                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
     ? Changed Sec.  7 at the department's  request to allow                                                                    
     TRS  to accept  vocational  rehabilitation services  in                                                                    
     other states for teachers on a disability pension.                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
     ?  Adjusted  Sec.  9 at  the  department's  request  to                                                                    
     clarify which retiree medical  plan applies to teachers                                                                    
     who retire in  the new DB tier. Also  updates the first                                                                    
     risk adjustment  to health care premiums  to 2024, five                                                                    
     years after the effective date.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
     ?  Removed from  Sec. 12,  at the  Department of  Law's                                                                    
     request, the requirement that  a teacher's spouse agree                                                                    
     to the initial choice between the DB and DC plans.                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
     ? Adds  a new  Sec. 13 at  the department's  request so                                                                    
     teachers  appointed to  disability in  the DC  plan can                                                                    
     receive vocational rehabilitation in other states.                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
     ? Conforms Sec. 15 to the new effective date.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
5:26:10 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR.  CARILLO continued  to  read  the changes  to  HB  83 from  a                                                               
document  titled,  "Explanation  of  Changes,  HB  83,  PERs/TRS,                                                               
Version  N  to  Version  T,   which  read  as  follows  [original                                                               
punctuation provided]:                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
     ? Clarified Sec.  18 language covering non-occupational                                                                    
     disability benefits, as requested by the department.                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
     ? Changed Sec. 19 at  the department's request to allow                                                                    
     PERS  to accept  vocational rehabilitation  services in                                                                    
     other states for those on a disability pension.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
     ?  Adjusted  Sec. 20  at  the  department's request  to                                                                    
     clarify   which  retiree   medical   plan  applies   to                                                                    
     employees who retire  in the new DB  tier. Also updates                                                                    
     the first  risk adjustment  to health care  premiums to                                                                    
     2024, five years after the effective date.                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
     ?  Removed from  Sec. 25,  at the  Department of  Law's                                                                    
     request, the requirement that  a teacher's spouse agree                                                                    
     to the initial choice between the DB and DC plans.                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
     ? Adds  a new  Sec. 26 at  the department's  request so                                                                    
     teachers  appointed to  disability in  the DC  plan can                                                                    
     receive vocational rehabilitation in other states.                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
     ? Sec. 29  has a conforming change to  a section number                                                                    
     within the bill.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
     ? Sec.  30 has been  changed so  it does not  alter the                                                                    
     department's  existing  regulations   process  for  the                                                                    
     retirement systems.                                                                                                        
     ?  Section 31  has  conforming changes  to reflect  the                                                                    
     appropriate section numbers in the CS.                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
     ?  Section 32  changes the  effective date  to July  1,                                                                    
     2019                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
MR. CARILLO stated those were all the changes to the bill.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
5:27:42 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  LEDOUX  made  a  motion  to  adopt  the  proposed                                                               
committee  substitute  (CS) for  HB  83  labeled as  30-LS0315\T,                                                               
Wayne, 3/30/18,  as the  work draft.   There being  no objection,                                                               
Version T was before the committee.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
5:28:09 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH said  he was opposed to  anything that would                                                               
restore an  undefined obligation.  He  was unsure if there  was a                                                               
fiscal  note for  the defined  benefits  (DB) program.   He  then                                                               
remarked  that there  was  not a  fiscal note.    He offered  his                                                               
concern  that the  state would  be "saddled"  with liability  and                                                               
long-term  obligations, which  he  characterized as  significant.                                                               
He  argued that  the  state  currently has  a  $7  billion to  $8                                                               
billion unmet obligation.   He related his  understanding that an                                                               
evaluation must be  completed to determine the cost  of the plan.                                                               
He indicated  members would be  voting on something unknown.   He                                                               
said he was not supportive of this.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
5:29:13 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS offered  a note on process.   He related his                                                               
understanding that  the fiscal note  would be completed  when the                                                               
bill  reached the  House  Finance Standing  Committee.   At  that                                                               
point  the Department  of Revenue  (DOR) would  run an  actuarial                                                               
analysis, he said.   He acknowledged that it does  put members in                                                               
the position  of voting on  policy issues rather than  the fiscal                                                               
issues.   He  acknowledged that  Representative Birch's  comments                                                               
were noted and appreciated.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH said he objected to the policy.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
5:30:54 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS opened public testimony on HB 83.                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
5:31:23 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHRIS  CAIRNS,  Staff,   Information  Technology,  Juneau  School                                                               
District;  Representative,  Alaska Public  Employees  Association                                                               
(APEA), testified  in support  of HB  83.  He  stated that  HB 83                                                               
represents  a balm  to  the myriad  of  uncertainties for  public                                                               
employees.   During a bargaining  session he reviewed a  chart of                                                               
the  number of  employees that  occupy each  cell of  the support                                                               
staffs' salary  schedule.  He  noticed many staff had  served 1-6                                                               
or  15-25 years  of  service,  but very  few  had  7-14 years  of                                                               
service.   He later confirmed that  more than half of  all Juneau                                                               
education support staff had seven or fewer years of service.                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR.  CAIRNS  said  that  he could  not  definitively  state  this                                                               
resulted  from   the  2006   switch  from   the  DB   to  defined                                                               
contribution (DC) plan.  The  timeline certainly fits.  He stated                                                               
that he and his co-workers  have frequently discussed the concept                                                               
of DB  plan and  the peace of  mind it provides.   He  related at                                                               
last night's  APEA union meeting  with the school board,  a board                                                               
member asked  besides wages what the  biggest challenge employees                                                               
faced.   The  vice-president confidently  identified the  biggest                                                               
challenge as retention.  He stated  that the APEA needed to bring                                                               
back DB plans.   Every head nodded in  enthusiastic agreement, he                                                               
said.                                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
5:33:14 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR. CAIRNS, having spoken to  management and labor organizations,                                                               
offered   his  belief   that  nearby   areas  such   as  Spokane,                                                               
Washington,  would lure  away the  best employees.   He  reported                                                               
these areas  pay as  much or  more while the  cost of  living was                                                               
much  less  than  in  Juneau.    He  also  testified  that  these                                                               
employers  commonly  mentioned  a   DB  option  as  a  mitigating                                                               
enticement.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
MR.  CAIRNS offered  his belief  that retaining  staff represents                                                               
the  key  to  doing  more  with less.    Currently,  many  public                                                               
employees face this challenge, he  said.  He predicted that prior                                                               
mistakes   would   be   repeated,  and   training   will   reduce                                                               
efficiencies  due  to  lost  institutional   knowledge.    As  an                                                               
example, he  felt that if  he left it  would take a  new employee                                                               
replacing him  about two  to three  years to learn  the job.   It                                                               
takes   time   to   build   the   necessary   relationships   and                                                               
comprehending  the complexities  of APEA's  mission, process  and                                                               
role.     This  would   not  include   time  to   gain  technical                                                               
competencies specific  to school district  information technology                                                               
needs  or  shaping  policy  and   procedures  in  innovative  and                                                               
productive ways.                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
5:34:27 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR. CAIRNS offered  that his job was not unique  and other public                                                               
employees would  relate to his point  of view.  As  many perceive                                                               
it,  since 2006  the  Public Employees  Retirement System  (PERS)                                                               
incentivizes  five years  of service,  which  coincides with  the                                                               
timeframe when employees  have begun to excel at their  jobs.  He                                                               
lamented that  five years was  the most inefficient  timeframe in                                                               
which  to lose  someone since  they have  learned their  jobs and                                                               
they leave.  He urged members  to support HB 83 for these reasons                                                               
and  many  more that  he  does  not have  time  to  address.   He                                                               
appreciated committee members' time and thanked them.                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
5:35:06 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH  asked whether any private  sector employees                                                               
have a  DB program.   He recalled  previously the sense  was that                                                               
most private  sector employees were  moving away from  it because                                                               
of the uncertainty of the liability.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
MR.  CAIRNS  responded  no.   He  reported  from  an  information                                                               
technology  perspective  that the  wage  level  was less  in  the                                                               
public sphere than in the private sector.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
5:36:01 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE KNOPP  asked for  an explanation on  the five-year                                                               
timeframe in terms of [employee retention].                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
MR. CAIRNS answered that employees  receive a 25 percent vestment                                                               
after  2 years  of service  and  an additional  25 percent  every                                                               
additional  year  until  the fifth  year  when  employees  become                                                               
vested.                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
5:36:34 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE   KNOPP  asked   whether   employees  lacked   any                                                               
incentive to stay after becoming vested at five years.                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
MR. CAIRNS  related that  some employees  in his  department have                                                               
left citing this as a specific reason.                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
5:37:18 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
ALICIA   HUGHES-SKANDIJS,   Member,    Alaska   State   Employees                                                               
Association (ASEA), urged member to support  HB 83.  She said she                                                               
considers herself  a poster  child for the  kind of  state worker                                                               
who would  benefit from this bill.   She identified herself  as a                                                               
Tier IV employee working for  the Department of Health and Social                                                               
Services (DHSS).   In  September she  would become  fully vested,                                                               
she  said.   She has  served as  a grants  administrator and  she                                                               
loves  her work.    She  feels the  programs  she  serves make  a                                                               
difference and benefit  the state.  She would like  to keep doing                                                               
this job.   She  pointed out  that the  incentive of  receiving a                                                               
pension would play  a large role in  her decision-making process.                                                               
In  the  four   years  since  she  has  worked   for  the  state,                                                               
significant turnover  has occurred in  her office.   She reported                                                               
that  when staff  reach  vesting  and leave,  it  means she  must                                                               
continually train people,  which she felt was  an inefficient use                                                               
of staff  time.  She  has experienced  trained staff leave.   She                                                               
offered her  belief that staff  often left at the  five-year mark                                                               
after having built up their resumes.   Those who leave after five                                                               
years or more  take institutional knowledge with  them which adds                                                               
to organizational instability, she said.                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
5:39:21 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MS.  HUGHES-SKANDIJS  stated that  she  also  serves as  a  union                                                               
steward, so  she comes into  contact with numerous  state workers                                                               
in other departments.   She speaks not only on  behalf of herself                                                               
but for many  employees who want and support this.   She remarked                                                               
that the five-year vesting often comes up during conversations.                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
5:39:52 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MS. HUGHES-SKANDIJS  stated she grew  up in West  Virginia before                                                               
moving to Alaska.  They moved away  from the DB to DC plan, which                                                               
lead to  turnover problems, retention, quality  of employees, and                                                               
the cost to  the state.  She reported that  West Virginia did not                                                               
find it was  a cheap way to  administer.  Not only  did they have                                                               
an unfunded liability, but it was  not working out for the state.                                                               
Since  then, West  Virginia  has returned  to a  DB  plan and  79                                                               
percent of public  employees switched back.  The DB  plan was not                                                               
only  better for  employees but  also better  for employers,  she                                                               
said.                                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
5:40:35 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MS. HUGHES-SKANDIJS offered to provide  some facts and figures to                                                               
the  committee.   She  argued  a  DB  plan  has perks  when  best                                                               
practices were followed  due to higher returns  and risk sharing.                                                               
She  offered her  belief that  this reflects  the values  of this                                                               
great  state  to compensate  people  who  provide a  lifetime  of                                                               
service to  Alaska with stability.   She felt these  people would                                                               
continue to  participate in  the economy  when their  standard of                                                               
living was higher at the end of their careers.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
5:41:43 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  BIRCH asked  whether she  had any  information of                                                               
private sector  entities that  have moved  to a  DB program.   He                                                               
said  he  was  not  aware  of  any.    He  expressed  concern  on                                                               
unconstrained costs due to actuarial estimates.                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
5:42:39 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  LEDOUX asked  for  further  clarification on  how                                                               
many of the 49 other states have DC or DB plans.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
MS. HUGHES-SKANDIJS  offered her  belief that  Alaska may  be the                                                               
only state without a DB plan  for teachers.  She further remarked                                                               
that benefits  were better  for public  safety officers  than for                                                               
educational employees.   She was  unsure of states that  offer DB                                                               
plans for all employees.  She stated that West Virginia does.                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
5:43:31 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  TUCK  asked  whether   she  had  social  security                                                               
benefits in West Virginia.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
MS. HUGHES-SKANDIJS said she was  unsure.  She recalled receiving                                                               
a letter  from the  Social Security  Administration that  she had                                                               
not contributed enough into the  system to be eligible to receive                                                               
social security benefits upon retirement.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK thanked the two testifiers.                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
5:44:18 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
TIM PARKER,  President, NEA-Alaska, stated  he was also  a former                                                               
teacher.  He said more than  half of the educators in Alaska fall                                                               
into the  DC retirement system.   This  bill would allow  them to                                                               
select a DB plan.                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
MR. PARKER  stated that younger  teachers were leaving  Alaska in                                                               
numbers  never seen  before and  replacing them  has become  more                                                               
difficult.   Last year  Alaska had  250 open  teaching positions.                                                               
Last month the  job fair that used to attract  thousands only had                                                               
171  candidates.   Over the  past  3 years  numbers have  dropped                                                               
about 20 percent per year.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
5:45:58 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR. PARKER  said that  Alaska teachers hired  after 2006  have no                                                               
access  to DB  plans  or to  social security  benefits.   Due  to                                                               
penalties any  social security benefits  teachers have  earned in                                                               
any  previous   jobs  have  been   drastically  reduced   by  the                                                               
government pension offset.   He characterized this  as creating a                                                               
crisis in  education.   Educators have referred  to Tier  III and                                                               
Tier  IV as  the death  tiers because  they cannot  realistically                                                               
retire on their wages.  Many  of them have gone onto other states                                                               
websites to calculate  how much more money they need  to put into                                                               
their retirement  system monthly  in order to  retire at  age 65.                                                               
He  reported some  have said  it was  up to  $4,000 per  month in                                                               
additional contributions.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
5:46:55 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR. PARKER  expressed concern about  losing quality  educators at                                                               
such an  accelerated rate.   He estimated  it may cost  the state                                                               
$20 million per year.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
5:47:11 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS  announced that some members  were receiving                                                               
only about  50 percent or less  of his comments due  to the audio                                                               
quality.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
5:47:47 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR.  PARKER offered  to submit  his  comments in  writing to  the                                                               
committee.   He  reported that  Alaska's teachers  were the  only                                                               
ones  without access  to a  DB contribution  system.   He further                                                               
reported that Alaska was one of  only 16 states without access to                                                               
social security benefits or supplemental  benefits, which he felt                                                               
was a critical point.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
5:48:31 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS,  after first  determining no one  wished to                                                               
testify, closed public testimony on HB  83.  He announced that HB
83 would come back before the committee at a later hearing.                                                                     

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
HB407 Sponsor Statement 4.2.18.pdf HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM
HB 407
HB 407 Sectional Analysis 4.2.18.pdf HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM
HB 407
HB407 ver D 4.2.18.pdf HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM
HB 407
HB407 Fiscal Note 4.2.18.pdf HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM
HB 407
SCR 17 Sponsor Statement.pdf HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM
SCR 17
SCR017A.PDF HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM
SCR 17
SCR 17 Fiscal Note.pdf HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM
SCR 17
SCR 17 Support CDVSA 2015 Victimization Survey.pdf HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM
SCR 17
SCR 17 Support Ltr Women.pdf HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM
SCR 17
SCR 17 Support Materials 2018 Theme.pdf HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM
SCR 17
SCR 17 Support Materials CDC National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey.pdf HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM
SCR 17
SCR 17 Support Materials News Article 11.20.2016.pdf HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM
SCR 17
SB163 Sponsor Statement 3.28.18.pdf HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM
SB 163
SB163 ver D 3.28.18.pdf HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM
SB 163
SB163 Fiscal Note DOT-MSCVE 3.28.18.pdf HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM
SB 163
HB083 Sponsor Statement 2.28.17.pdf HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM
HB 83
HB083 Sectional Analysis 2.28.18.pdf HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM
HB 83
HB083 ver N 2.20.18.pdf HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
HB 83
HB083 Fiscal Note DOA-COM 2.9.18.pdf HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM
HB 83
HB083 Fiscal Note DOA-DRB 2.9.18.pdf HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM
HB 83
HB083 Supporting Document - 401k retirement readiness 4.18.17.pdf HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM
HB 83
HB083 Supporting Document - Alaska Comparable Plans 4.18.17.pdf HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM
HB 83
HB083 Supporting Document - Compare DB to DC access 4.18.17.pdf HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM
HB 83
HB083 Oakley Presentation.pdf HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM
HB 83
HB083 Letters of Support 2.28.18.pdf HSTA 3/20/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 3/22/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM
HB 83
HB 83 ver T 4.2.18.pdf HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM
HB 83
HB83 Explanation of changes from ver N to ver T 4.3.18.pdf HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
HB 83
HB83 Legal Memorandum on ver T 4.2.18.pdf HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
HSTA 4/5/2018 3:15:00 PM
HB 83
Work Draft 30-LS1526 ver D 4.2.18.pdf HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
Work Draft 30-LS1526 ver D Sectional Analysis 4.2.18.pdf HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM
Overview of Permanent Fund Proposals Presentation 3.29.18.pdf HSTA 4/3/2018 3:15:00 PM